Domain Name Dispute Resolution

.COM companies are all the rage with the stockinterests in the domain name; and
market riding high and falling as the mood shifts.3.The domain name has been registered and is being
Everybody it appears is going on-line and there hasused in bad faith.
been a massive rush to register all manner of domainA series of examples of bad faith are given in the
names. In February 2000 there were over 200,000ICANN policy document.
.co.uk domains registered compared to just underA recent case heard by the WIPO arbitration and
15,000 at the same time last year and there weremediation centre demonstrates the effectiveness of
just under 9,500,000 .com domains registered by 1stthe procedures. In Digitronics Inventioneering
March 2000! The domain name is seen as central toCorporation -v- @Six.Net Registered the two domain
any marketing strategy as it is the "sign post" to thenames in question were "sixnet.com" and "six.net".
web site hopefully worth millions!The complaint was submitted electronically to the
However, due to the simple fact that the internet isWIPO Centre on 17th January 2000 and a Panel
global, there are not enough domain names to goappointed. The claimant alleged that the domain name
round and problems arise when there are competingholder had no rights or legitimate interests in respect
businesses with the same name. To address thisof the domain name and that the domain name had
problem the World Intellectual Property Organisationbeen registered in bad faith.
(WIPO) through their Arbitration and MediationThe Panel decided that the respondent had been
Centre established a dispute resolution service toknown by the domain name "Sixnet" even though it
allow a cheap and effective means of resolvinghad acquired no trademark or servicemark rights. As
disputes without going to court. It follows thethe complainer had failed to establish that @Six.Net
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names andhad no rights or legitimate interests in the domain
Numbers (ICANN) dispute resolution policy whichname the application was refused. Of particular
deals with disputes concerning .com, .net, and .orginterest is the fact that the respondents were a
domain names.Canadian company and the claimants were registered
The ICANN procedure is only available for disputesin New York. Using the WIPO Panel complex
concerning allegedly "abusive" registration of thejurisdictional problems were avoided. The decision
domain name. There are three criteria that have towas issued on 1st March 2000 only six weeks after
be met.the claim was raised.
1.The domain name is identical or confusingly similar toUsing the WIPO arbitration and mediation centre the
a trademark or servicemark in which the complainerparties were able to come to a cost effective
has rights;resolution to an International dispute within the
2.The domain name holder has no rights or legitimatespecified timescale of between 45 and 50 days.